Just got back from lunch with a CJP-Seminary dual-degree prospective student, who was on a campus visit to EMU from Ohio. I love the opportunity to meet with prospective students in the two programs. First, it hopefully helps them in discerning a very significant, life-changing decision. Second, it helps me figure out why I'm here in these programs, studying for four or five years, with no strong sense for what/where comes next. Last, and perhaps most important: the lunch is free (to me). Through stimulating discussion that went by in a flash, my discussion with him helped me see some of the things that are really great about living in two academic worlds simultaneously, and what's not so great. So after the jump, there's a quick three-each list:What's great:
- Three-year Formation track in the seminary is a great complement to CJP self-care learning
- Theological framework balanced with social sciences framework
- Emphases/tracks available in the respective programs offer a lot of creativity (mine: Restorative Justice - CJP/Academics (theology & ethics) - Seminary)
- Emotional and psychological overhead associated with living in two different social networks
- Having to say "no" to a lot of fun stuff
- Arguments that sometimes come up between different theological/philosophical perspectives, aka "academic turf war"
I reused the van Gogh painting above because it strikes me as a beautiful illustration of the fluidity in the way that I've experienced God working in my life...and will continue to do so. Blessings to Roger as he contemplates this in his own life.
No comments:
Post a Comment