This is the second post in a series on the book Christianity, Democracy, and the Radical Ordinary, by Stanley Hauerwas & Rom Coles. This series is being authored by Jonathan McRay, Jonathan Swartz, & Brian Gumm. For a bit of context, see the intro post, and here's the first post from John.
[Originally an email back to John and Brian]
[Originally an email back to John and Brian]
As I read the intro there were two things that I knew were going to
be mentioned in our discussions, and I knew they were going to come from you
John: the introductory Wendell Berry quote and the reference to ecotones! And
you've come through on both!
Actually I do find a lot of resonance with this from Berry: "My
point is that when one passes from any abstract order... to the daily life and
work of one's own farm, one passes from relative simplicity into a complexity
that is irreducible except by disaster and ultimately is incomprehensible."
Both Christianity and Democracy have become abstractions and many assume that
one can speak of either and assume common definitions. Coles and Hauerwas
helpfully point in the direction of "moving to the farm" (in terms of
making the abstract more concrete) in this book, and I hope it will be a
conversation that becomes fruitful. Berry’s quote also mentions, (you know,
you've read it too) that to move to the farm in this way by necessity puts us
into touch with the complexity (and wildness) of Creation and reminds us of our
limitations. I think it notable that he mentions the limitations of knowledge,
intelligence, character, and bodily strength - that's a lot of limitations. Also
notable is that these limitations don’t seem to be despair-inducing for Berry,
just observations about what happens when one passes from abstract to daily
life and work (or when one moves to the farm).
I do think that to attempt to make abstractions concrete is to
recognize place, at least I think it difficult to avoid place in these kinds of
discussions (not that it hasn't been avoided in plenty of cases), and I'm happy
that they have employed what seems to be a pretty ad hoc approach to these
conversations. They are open about the reality that even as they went about
other duties they kept this conversation in mind as a way to keep working at
it. Excellent stuff.